Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The clash between the Green Bay Packers and the Philadelphia Eagles represents one of the most exciting matchups in the NFL.

These two storied franchises bring together different football philosophies, passionate fan bases, and contrasting team cultures whenever they meet on the gridiron.

The green bay packers vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats reveal more than just numbers—they tell the story of strategic battles, individual excellence, and moments that define NFL legacies.

Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

When these teams collide, fans witness:

• Tactical innovation from two of the league’s most respected coaching staffs
• Elite quarterback play that showcases different styles of offensive leadership
• Defensive brilliance from units that can change games with a single play
• Special teams execution that often provides the narrow margin of victory

This comprehensive guide breaks down every aspect of this fascinating rivalry, from the latest game statistics to historical context.

Whether you’re a die-hard fan analyzing every snap or a casual viewer seeking to understand what makes this matchup special, this guide provides the insights, numbers, and analysis to appreciate the full significance of Packers vs Eagles.

Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The rivalry between Green Bay and Philadelphia embodies two different approaches to NFL excellence that have each proven successful over decades of competition.

Historical Significance

Category	Green Bay Packers	Philadelphia Eagles
Franchise Founded	1919	1933
Total NFL Championships	13 (4 Super Bowls)	4 (1 Super Bowl)
Hall of Fame Players	25	10
All-Time Win Percentage	.571	.490

The Green Bay Packers represent NFL tradition at its finest:

• Small-market success story that has thrived despite being the league’s smallest market
• Storied legacy dating back to the legendary Vince Lombardi era
• Community ownership model unique in American professional sports
• Quarterback excellence tradition from Bart Starr through Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers

The Philadelphia Eagles bring their own distinctive identity:

• Passionate fan culture that embodies the city’s blue-collar ethos
• Defensive innovation throughout multiple eras of NFL football
• Risk-taking philosophy in both player acquisition and game strategy
• Resilient organizational culture that rebounded from setbacks to achieve championship success

What makes this rivalry particularly intriguing is the contrast in organizational philosophies:

• Green Bay typically builds through the draft with a focus on long-term development
• Philadelphia often pursues aggressive free agent acquisitions and trades
• The Packers emphasize system continuity across coaching regimes
• The Eagles have embraced tactical innovation and scheme flexibility

Despite not being traditional divisional rivals, their matchups have produced memorable moments that elevate this matchup beyond ordinary regular-season games.

Recent Game Overview

The latest installment in this compelling rivalry lived up to expectations, delivering a closely contested battle that showcased both teams’ strengths while exposing vulnerabilities. The game flow reflected the back-and-forth nature of truly elite NFL competition.

Game Summary

Quarter	Green Bay Packers	Philadelphia Eagles	Key Moment
1st Quarter	7	7	Eagles’ opening drive TD
2nd Quarter	10	14	Watson’s 50-yard TD reception
3rd Quarter	7	10	A.J. Brown’s 40-yard TD catch
4th Quarter	0	3	Elliott’s game-winning 51-yard FG
Final Score	24	34	–

Critical Game Factors

Several elements shaped the outcome of this contest:

• Turnover battle slightly favored Philadelphia (1-0)
• Time of possession advantage to the Eagles (33:27 to 26:33)
• Third-down conversion rate: Eagles 60%, Packers 48%
• Red zone efficiency: Eagles 3/4, Packers 2/3
• Explosive plays (20+ yards): Eagles 6, Packers 4

The game featured multiple lead changes, with momentum swinging dramatically throughout all four quarters. The Eagles ultimately secured victory through superior execution in crucial fourth-quarter situations, converting critical third downs and delivering the decisive field goal when it mattered most.

Weather conditions were ideal, allowing both offenses to implement their full playbooks without environmental limitations. This created the perfect laboratory for evaluating player performance and coaching strategy under optimal conditions.

Quarterback Stat Overview

The quarterback matchup featured Jalen Hurts and Jordan Love—two young talents representing different QB development paths who both showed why their franchises have invested heavily in their futures.

Head-to-Head Quarterback Comparison

Statistic	Jalen Hurts (Eagles)	Jordan Love (Packers)
Passing Yards	320	280
Touchdowns	3	2
Interceptions	0	1
Completion %	71%	67%
Passer Rating	128.3	98.4
Rushing Yards	55	25
Sacks Taken	2	3

Jalen Hurts Performance Highlights

Hurts demonstrated his evolution as a complete quarterback:

• Perfect touchdown-to-interception ratio showed improved decision-making
• Exceptional third-down performance (9/12 for 110 yards) in high-pressure situations
• Dual-threat capability created defensive conflicts throughout the game
• Pre-snap recognition allowed him to identify and exploit favorable matchups
• Leadership under pressure during the game-winning drive in the fourth quarter

His most impressive throw came on a 40-yard touchdown to A.J. Brown where he manipulated the safety with his eyes before delivering a perfectly placed pass between defenders.

Jordan Love Performance Analysis

Love showed significant development despite the loss:

• Impressive deep ball accuracy on his 50-yard touchdown to Christian Watson
• Growth in progression reading compared to earlier performances
• Pocket mobility to extend plays when protection broke down
• Mental toughness bouncing back from early pressure to deliver quality throws
• Red zone efficiency with both touchdown passes coming inside the 20

His performance was marred only by a crucial fourth-quarter interception that came during a potential game-tying drive.

Key Quarterback Insights

What separated these quarterbacks wasn’t necessarily talent but experience in critical moments:

• Hurts’ additional seasoning as a starter provided better decision-making under pressure
• Love showed tremendous potential but occasionally hesitated at decision points
• Both demonstrated the arm talent and athletic ability required for modern NFL quarterback play
• The offensive systems built around their unique skills maximized their effectiveness

This quarterback battle showcased two different developmental trajectories, with Hurts slightly further along his path while Love demonstrated why Green Bay believes in his long-term potential.

Running Back Stat Overview

The ground game provided both teams with offensive balance while testing the gap discipline and tackling prowess of opposing front sevens.

Running Back Statistical Comparison

Player	Team	Rushing Yards	Touchdowns	Avg. Per Carry	Receptions	Receiving Yards
D’Andre Swift	Eagles	110	1	5.5	4	30
Aaron Jones	Packers	85	1	4.7	3	25
AJ Dillon	Packers	45	1	3.8	1	10
Kenneth Gainwell	Eagles	20	0	4.0	2	15

D’Andre Swift: Offensive Catalyst

Swift’s performance showcased why Philadelphia prioritized acquiring him:

• Explosive cutback ability turned well-defended plays into substantial gains
• Patient running style allowed blocks to develop before hitting holes
• Receiving versatility created matchup problems for Green Bay linebackers
• Yards after contact consistently extended plays beyond initial defensive contact
• Critical third-down conversions sustained drives at pivotal moments

His most impressive run came on a 22-yard burst in the third quarter where he made three defenders miss in space.

Packers’ Two-Headed Approach

Green Bay’s traditional committee approach featured complementary skills:

• Aaron Jones provided:
  • Veteran vision identifying cutback lanes
  • Reliable pass protection in blitz situations
  • Receiving threat out of the backfield
  • Consistent positive yardage on first downs
• AJ Dillon contributed:
  • Power running in short-yardage situations
  • North-south efficiency in four-minute offense
  • Pass protection against blitzing linebackers
  • Goal-line effectiveness

The rotation kept both runners fresh throughout the game while presenting Philadelphia’s defense with contrasting styles to defend.

Running Game Impact

The commitment to establishing the run by both teams created several strategic advantages:

• Set up effective play-action passing opportunities
• Controlled game tempo and time of possession
• Created manageable third-down situations
• Reduced defensive pass rush aggression
• Maintained offensive balance and unpredictability

The running backs also excelled in pass protection, delivering key blocks that provided their quarterbacks crucial extra seconds on several explosive passing plays.

Wide Receiver and Tight End Statistics

The passing game featured some of the most talented receivers in the NFL showcasing their skills against quality defensive backs.

Receiver Production Comparison

Player	Team	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Touchdowns	Targets	Yards After Catch
A.J. Brown	Eagles	10	140	2	12	62
Christian Watson	Packers	8	115	1	10	48
DeVonta Smith	Eagles	7	95	1	9	35
Romeo Doubs	Packers	6	80	0	9	22
Dallas Goedert	Eagles	5	60	0	7	28
Luke Musgrave	Packers	4	50	1	5	18

A.J. Brown: Dominant Force

Brown’s exceptional performance demonstrated his elite status:

• Contested catch dominance – won 5/5 contested catch opportunities
• Route versatility across the entire route tree
• Red zone effectiveness with both touchdowns coming inside the 20
• Yards after catch broke multiple tackles to extend plays
• Third-down reliability converted 6 third downs into first downs

His most impressive play came on a 40-yard touchdown reception where he broke a tackle and outran multiple defenders to the end zone.

Rising Star: Christian Watson

Watson showed why Green Bay is excited about his development:

• Deep threat capability evidenced by his 50-yard touchdown
• Improved route precision compared to his rookie season
• Physical play at the catch point against tight coverage
• Run blocking effectiveness on perimeter running plays
• Contested catch ability on several high-difficulty receptions

His evolution from purely a speed threat to a more complete receiver has significantly expanded Green Bay’s offensive capabilities.

Complementary Receivers

Both teams benefited from quality depth in their receiving corps:

• DeVonta Smith complimented Brown perfectly with precise route running and reliable hands
• Romeo Doubs provided Love with a dependable intermediate target
• Tight ends Dallas Goedert and Luke Musgrave created matchup problems against linebackers

The collective talent in both receiving groups forced defensive coordinators to make difficult coverage decisions throughout the game.

Key Receiving Insights

Several factors influenced the passing game effectiveness:

• The Eagles’ receiver duo of Brown and Smith presented impossible coverage dilemmas
• Green Bay’s developing chemistry between Love and his receivers showed promising signs
• Tight end contributions in both passing and blocking phases provided offensive flexibility
• Yards after catch significantly impacted total offensive production
• Contested catch success rates favored Philadelphia’s receivers in crucial situations

The receiver play in this matchup exemplified the increasing importance of versatile pass-catchers in modern NFL offenses.

Defensive Contributions

Despite the offensive fireworks, several defensive players delivered standout performances that shaped the game’s outcome.

Defensive Statistical Leaders

Player	Team	Tackles	Sacks	QB Hits	Interceptions	Forced Fumbles	Passes Defended
De’Vondre Campbell	Packers	10	0	1	0	1	1
Nakobe Dean	Eagles	8	0	0	0	0	1
Haason Reddick	Eagles	6	2	4	0	0	0
Jaire Alexander	Packers	5	0	0	1	0	2
Rashan Gary	Packers	4	2	5	0	0	0
Darius Slay	Eagles	3	0	0	1	0	2

Defensive Game-Changers

Several players delivered critical defensive plays:

• Haason Reddick (Eagles):
  • Game-defining fourth-quarter sack that ended Green Bay’s final drive
  • Consistent pressure that disrupted Love’s timing throughout the game
  • Edge containment that limited Packers’ outside running game
  • Multiple quarterback hits that affected throw accuracy
• Darius Slay (Eagles):
  • Crucial interception that halted a promising Packers drive
  • Sticky coverage against Green Bay’s top receivers
  • Excellent communication in secondary coverage adjustments
  • Run support tackles that prevented explosive plays
• De’Vondre Campbell (Packers):
  • Team-leading 10 tackles showcasing sideline-to-sideline range
  • Forced fumble that temporarily shifted momentum
  • Pass coverage responsibilities against tight ends and running backs
  • Defensive signal-calling ensuring proper alignments
• Rashan Gary (Packers):
  • Two sacks demonstrating elite pass-rush ability
  • Consistent pressure forcing Hurts out of his comfort zone
  • Run game disruption by maintaining edge containment
  • High-motor pursuit affecting multiple plays away from his side

Defensive Strategies

Both defensive coordinators employed specific approaches:

Eagles Defensive Approach:

• Focused on containing Love within the pocket rather than maximum pressure
• Mixed coverage looks to confuse Green Bay’s young quarterback
• Employed disciplined gap control against the Packers’ running game
• Utilized selective blitzing in high-leverage situations

Packers Defensive Approach:

• Attempted to limit Hurts’ running opportunities with spy techniques
• Employed bracket coverage against A.J. Brown on obvious passing downs
• Prioritized sure tackling to limit yards after catch/contact
• Mixed defensive fronts to create confusion in protection assignments

Defensive Impact by Quarter

The defenses showed varying effectiveness throughout the game:

• First Quarter: Both defenses struggled to establish dominance
• Second Quarter: Packers’ defense created two three-and-outs
• Third Quarter: Eagles adjusted coverage schemes to limit deep passes
• Fourth Quarter: Philadelphia’s pass rush dominated when it mattered most

The defensive performances demonstrated how even in high-scoring games, timely defensive plays often determine outcomes.

Special Teams

The kicking game proved decisive in this closely contested battle, with field position advantages and scoring opportunities significantly impacting the final result.

Special Teams Statistical Comparison

Player	Team	Field Goals	Longest FG	Extra Points	Punting Avg.	Inside 20
Jake Elliott	Eagles	3/3	51 yards	4/4	–	–
Anders Carlson	Packers	2/2	47 yards	2/2	–	–
Arryn Siposs	Eagles	–	–	–	46.8 yards	2
Daniel Whelan	Packers	–	–	–	48.3 yards	3

Game-Defining Special Teams Moments

Several special teams plays significantly impacted the outcome:

• Jake Elliott’s 51-yard field goal in the fourth quarter provided the Eagles’ margin of victory
• Packers’ punt coverage pinning Philadelphia inside their 10-yard line twice
• Eagles’ kickoff strategy forcing returns rather than allowing touchbacks
• Anders Carlson’s 47-yard field goal that temporarily swung momentum to Green Bay

Special Teams Excellence

The kicking specialists demonstrated exceptional skills:

• Jake Elliott (Eagles):
  • Perfect day on field goals and extra points
  • Clutch performance in high-pressure situations
  • Consistent kickoff depth and placement
  • Mental toughness in game-defining moments
• Anders Carlson (Packers):
  • Flawless execution on all kicking opportunities
  • Improved distance control from previous performances
  • Reliable touchback percentage on kickoffs
  • Confidence in adverse situations

The punting game also factored significantly into field position advantages, with both teams’ punters demonstrating excellent ball placement and hang time.

Special Teams Impact on Game Planning

The reliability of special teams units influenced coaching decisions:

• Philadelphia’s confidence in Elliott allowed aggressive fourth-down decision-making in fringe field goal range
• Green Bay’s improved kickoff coverage encouraged strategic kicks short of the goal line
• Both teams’ punt coverage excellence affected fourth-down decisions
• Return game preparation consumed significant practice resources for minimal game impact

This phase of the game, often overlooked in analysis, provided critical advantages at multiple junctures during the contest.

Game-Defining Moments

Beyond the statistics, certain plays stood out as pivotal turning points that shaped the narrative of this thrilling contest.

Moment #1: Hurts’ 40-Yard Touchdown Pass

The Eagles seized control when Jalen Hurts connected with A.J. Brown on a perfectly executed deep pass:

• Technical excellence:
  • Protection held up against Green Bay’s four-man rush
  • Hurts manipulated the safety with his eyes
  • Brown’s route created separation at the perfect moment
  • The throw placement allowed yards after catch
• Strategic significance:
  • Came after two consecutive Packers defensive stops
  • Shifted momentum back to Philadelphia sideline
  • Forced Green Bay to adjust coverage philosophy
  • Demonstrated Eagles’ big-play capability

Moment #2: Watson’s 50-Yard Touchdown

Christian Watson’s explosive play showcased Green Bay’s developing passing attack:

• Technical execution:
  • Play-action created initial defensive hesitation
  • Watson’s double move defeated press coverage
  • Love delivered perfect ball placement in stride
  • Downfield blocking secured the touchdown
• Game impact:
  • Tied the game during a period of Eagles’ momentum
  • Forced Philadelphia to respect deep passing threats
  • Built confidence in Green Bay’s young quarterback-receiver connection
  • Energized Packers’ sideline and shifted momentum

Moment #3: Reddick’s Fourth-Quarter Sack

Haason Reddick’s crucial third-down sack effectively ended Green Bay’s comeback hopes:

• Technical brilliance:
  • Pre-snap recognition of protection scheme
  • Perfect get-off timing at the snap
  • Hand technique to defeat offensive tackle
  • Closing speed to prevent quarterback escape
• Contextual importance:
  • Came with Packers driving for potential tying score
  • Forced punt with limited time remaining
  • Demonstrated Eagles’ ability to deliver in clutch situations
  • Exemplified defensive coordinator’s strategic pressure call

Moment #4: Elliott’s 51-Yard Field Goal

Jake Elliott’s perfect execution under pressure provided the decisive points:

• Technical perfection:
  • Clean operation from snap to hold to kick
  • Perfect ball striking technique
  • Trajectory high enough to clear rush
  • Distance control with minimal margin for error
• Psychological significance:
  • Demonstrated Philadelphia’s confidence in special teams
  • Increased pressure on Green Bay’s subsequent possession
  • Rewarded offense for driving into fringe field goal range
  • Validated coaching decision to attempt long field goal

These defining moments showcase how games often turn on a handful of plays where execution, strategy, and mental toughness intersect to create the narrow margins between victory and defeat.

Historical Context: Packers vs. Eagles Rivalry

To fully appreciate the significance of this latest chapter, we must place it within the broader historical context of the Packers-Eagles rivalry.

All-Time Series Statistics

Category	Green Bay Packers	Philadelphia Eagles
Total Games Played	46	46
Wins	29	17
Home Record	17-7	10-12
Away Record	12-10	7-17
Points Scored	1,156	967
Playoff Meetings	2 wins	2 wins
Super Bowl Titles	4	1

Historical Rivalry Development

The rivalry has evolved through several distinct phases:

• Early Years (1933-1960):
  • Dominated by Green Bay during the Lambeau era
  • Eagles’ championship teams of 1948-1949 created competitive balance
  • Characterized by run-heavy, defensive football
• Lombardi Era (1960-1967):
  • Packers’ dynasty established dominance in the series
  • 1960 NFL Championship (won by Philadelphia) remains a significant milestone
  • Showcased contrasting styles of the era’s best coaches
• Transitional Period (1968-1992):
  • Both franchises experienced periods of success and struggle
  • Series became more balanced as teams traded victories
  • Featured memorable quarterback performances (Jaworski vs. Dickey)
• Modern Era (1993-Present):
  • Favre and Rodgers eras brought renewed Packers success
  • Eagles’ Reid-McNabb teams created competitive rivalry
  • Recent games feature offensive innovation and explosive scoring

Memorable Matchups

Several games stand out in the historical series:

• 1960 NFL Championship: Eagles 17, Packers 13
  • Only championship game loss in Vince Lombardi’s career
  • Featured legendary goal-line stand by Philadelphia defense
  • Established Eagles as legitimate championship contender
• 2003 Divisional Playoff: Eagles 20, Packers 17 (OT)
  • “4th-and-26” conversion by McNabb to Freddie Mitchell
  • Devastating Favre interception in overtime
  • Cemented the rivalry’s modern intensity
• 2010 Season Opener: Packers 27, Eagles 20
  • Michael Vick’s emergence in Philadelphia
  • Aaron Rodgers’ offensive mastery
  • Foreshadowed Packers’ eventual Super Bowl run
• 2016 Monday Night Football: Packers 27, Eagles 13
  • Rodgers’ perfect performance (30/39, 313 yards, 2 TDs)
  • Demonstrated wide gap between franchises at that point
  • Last meeting before Eagles’ championship season

Organizational Connections

The rivalry features numerous personal connections:

• Reggie White: Hall of Fame defensive end who starred for both franchises
• Andy Reid: Eagles head coach who began NFL career as Packers assistant
• Doug Pederson: Won Super Bowl as Eagles coach after serving as Packers backup QB
• Multiple front office executives who crossed between organizations

These connections create additional narrative layers whenever the teams meet, as organizational knowledge and personal relationships add complexity to the competitive dynamic.

FAQ’s on Green Bay Packers Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats:

• Who claimed the MVP in the previous match?

Jalen Hurts earned MVP honors for his outstanding all-around performance. His statistical excellence (320 passing yards, 3 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 55 rushing yards) told only part of the story. What truly distinguished his performance was:

• Perfect decision-making in critical third-down situations
• Leadership under pressure during the game-winning fourth-quarter drive
• Dual-threat capabilities that repeatedly stressed Green Bay’s defense
• Pre-snap recognition identifying and exploiting favorable matchups
• Clutch throws in tight windows when plays had to be made

His ability to deliver in crucial situations while avoiding negative plays embodied the leadership qualities that define valuable players. The Eagles’ offense operated at peak efficiency under his guidance, with Hurts distributing the ball effectively to multiple receivers while also knowing when to take matters into his own hands as a runner.

• Was there any improvement to the defense in the game?

Both defenses showed mixed results against high-powered offensive attacks. Green Bay’s unit demonstrated:

• Improved tackling compared to earlier season performances
• De’Vondre Campbell’s leadership organizing defensive communication
• Rashan Gary’s elite pass-rushing is creating periodic disruption
• Jaire Alexander’s coverage limiting options on his side of the field

However, they struggled with:

• Containing A.J. Brown consistently throughout the game
• Third-down efficiency allowing too many drive-sustaining conversions
• Red zone stops with Philadelphia scoring on 3/4 opportunities

The Eagles’ defense, while not dominant statistically, made crucial stops when necessary:

• Haason Reddick’s clutch sack exemplified their bend-but-don’t-break approach
• Darius Slay’s interception demonstrated opportunistic playmaking
• Fourth-quarter execution when the game hung in balance
• Tackling fundamentals preventing explosive plays after catch

Both defenses face ongoing challenges in today’s offense-friendly NFL but showed the capacity to deliver game-changing plays even against high-powered opponents.

• The future objectives for both teams are what?

Both franchises have clear paths forward based on their current roster construction and organizational philosophies:

Philadelphia Eagles objectives:

• Maximize championship window while core players remain in their prime
• Continue Jalen Hurts’ development into elite franchise quarterback
• Address secondary depth concerns to complement pass rush strength
• Maintain offensive innovation to stay ahead of defensive adjustments
• Manage salary cap challenges created by aggressive roster building

Their immediate focus remains translating regular-season success into another Super Bowl appearance while their current core remains intact.

Green Bay Packers objectives:

• Accelerate Jordan Love’s development into franchise quarterback
• Develop young offensive skill players into consistent contributors
• Address defensive secondary inconsistency through scheme and personnel
• Balance win-now approach with traditional draft-and-develop philosophy
• Establish offensive identity post-Aaron Rodgers era

Green Bay’s traditional patient approach focuses on building sustainable success while remaining competitive during their quarterback transition.

Both teams must navigate the complex balance between immediate competitive goals and long-term organizational health, decisions that will shape their rivalry’s dynamics in coming seasons.

Also Check:

• Washington Commanders Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

Conclusion:

The Packers-Eagles rivalry continues to deliver exceptional football that showcases the best of what the NFL offers. The latest installment provided everything fans desire—athletic brilliance, strategic sophistication, dramatic moments, and ultimate uncertainty until the final whistle.

Key Takeaways from Recent Matchup

• Eagles’ offensive balance created consistent scoring opportunities throughout the game
• Packers’ developing passing attack showed promising signs despite the defeat
• Individual excellence from stars like A.J. Brown and Haason Reddick proved decisive
• Special teams execution ultimately provided Philadelphia’s margin of victory
• Coaching adjustments demonstrated both staffs’ tactical sophistication

What This Means Moving Forward

For Philadelphia:

• Championship window remains open with elite talent at key positions
• Hurts’ continued development into complete quarterback raises their ceiling
• Defensive pass rush remains their most reliable strength
• Special teams reliability provides advantage in close games

For Green Bay:

• Love’s progress suggests promising future at quarterback
• Young receiver development creates offensive optimism
• Defensive vulnerabilities require strategic adjustments
• Overall trajectory shows competitive growth despite result

Why This Rivalry Matters

What makes Packers-Eagles compelling extends beyond this single game:

• Contrasting organizational philosophies create natural narrative tension
• Historical significance of both franchises adds weight to each meeting
• Stylistic differences showcase football’s tactical diversity
• Passionate fan cultures enhance the emotional stakes

As both franchises continue their parallel journeys through NFL history, their occasional intersections will continue generating memorable football moments.

Their contrasting approaches to team building and on-field strategy ensure that these matchups will always represent more than just another regular season game—they showcase different visions of football excellence competing for validation.